**[The following information on annotated bibliographies is taken from the OWL at Purdue:

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/general/gl_annotatedbib.html] “

An annotated bibliography includes a summary and/or evaluation of each of the sources. Depending on your project or the assignment, your annotations may do one or more of the following: 1. Summarize: Some annotations merely summarize the source. What are the main arguments? What topics are covered? 2. Assess: After summarizing a source, it may be helpful to evaluate it. Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is it this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source? 3. Reflect: Once you’ve summarized and assessed a source, you need to ask how it fits into your research. Was this source helpful to you? How can you use this source in your research project? Has it changed how you think about your topic?” *Evaluating sources: Researchers need to be concerned about the sources they use as evidence. Some material you find might be based on incorrect or outdated information, or on poor logic. You should use evaluated books, scholarly journals, academic articles, etc. Be very careful about evaluating an Internet source. Is the author you are reading an established voice in the field? Is the publisher reputable? How current is the material?

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239069