Howard Community College Student Parking Problem in Campuses Discussion

admin one

2 months ago

Howard Community College Student Parking Problem in Campuses Discussion

Question Description

Working with your group, choose a campus-related problem such as student parking, campus food options, speeding on campus, availability of specific programs, access to health services, selection of classes, etc. and apply the structured problem-solving approach (on pg. 174 in the text) to identify a potential solution. Group reports are worth 50 points, should be between 5-6 pages, double-spaced using 12-point font (or 2.5 3 pages single-spaced) not including a references/work cited page. The report is due by 11:59pm on Sunday, November 22.

In your group reports, be sure to include the following:

A brief (but thorough) explanation of the campus-related problem your group chose
The criteria you established for an acceptable solution
A brief description of the research conducted to brainstorm and/or evaluate potential solutions
An explanation and discussion of the solution your group selected (and why)
An evaluation of your chosen solution what might you reasonably expect to happen as a result? What are some unintended consequences that may arise?
A brief reflection on the group process: how well did your group work together? What might you do differently in the future?
References page/works cited

Rubric

Group Outcomes

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGroup DynamicsRecognize and apply effective group dynamics

threshold: 3.0 pts

4.0 ptsAppropriate group dynamics were utilized effectively

3.0 ptsAppropriate group dynamics were attepted with mixed results

2.0 ptsGrop dynamics were inconsistent and results were poor

1.0 ptsGroup dymanics were not addressed

—

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGroup EthicsUnderstand and apply appropriate ethical standards to interpersonal, group, and public communication situations

threshold: 3.0 pts

4.0 ptsAppropriate ethical guidelines were followed

1.0 ptsAppropriate ethical guidelines were not followed

—

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGroup LanguageIdentify and demonstrate appropriate language, in interpersonal, group, and public communication situations

threshold: 3.0 pts

4.0 ptsLanguage was clear and appropriate

3.0 ptsLanguage use was acceptable

2.0 ptsLanguage use was inconsistent

1.0 ptsLanguage use was unclear

—

Total Points: 0.0



^{Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."}